Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 02:01
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Walking This Many Steps Per Day Can Cut Your Risk Of Early Death - HuffPost
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
MSU Taps J Batt As Next Director of Athletics - Michigan State University Athletics
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What kind of person makes you think "how come there are people like that"?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Spiraling with ChatGPT - TechCrunch
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Will India ever surpass China in Technology?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Why, after a divorce, would one still want to ruin the other one’s life?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What was Meghan Markle's reaction to the meeting between Prince William and Taylor Swift?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.
A runway under construction at Newark's beleaguered airport reopens early - NPR
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years: